Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

BANK KENTUCKY v. COMMONWEALTH KENTUCKY.

decided: December 2, 1907.

BANK OF KENTUCKY
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY.



ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.

Author: Mckenna

[ 207 U.S. Page 261]

 MR. JUSTICE MCKENNA delivered the opinion of the court.

This case involves the liability of plaintiffs in error, Bank of Kentucky and National Bank of Kentucky, to be assessed for certain back taxes under the revenue law of the State of

[ 207 U.S. Page 262]

     Kentucky. That law makes it the duty "of auditor's agents to cause to be listed for taxation all property omitted, or any portion of property omitted by the assessor, board of supervisors, board of valuation and assessment, or railroad commission, for any year or years." ยง 4241, Ky. Stats. (Carroll's Compilation, 1903).

In pursuance of other provisions of the section this suit was brought. There is no dispute about the facts. The Bank of Kentucky was chartered by the legislature of Kentucky in 1834. Its charter was subsequently twice extended, but was repealed by an act approved March 22, 1900. On that day the National Bank of Kentucky, was organized and took over its assets.

The purpose of the suit is to subject these assets to assessment for taxes for Jefferson county for the years 1898, 1899 and 1899-1900, and for the State for the year 1899-1900. Against the assessment for county taxes plaintiffs in error pleaded a judgment of the Circuit Court of the United States, which, it is contended, established that it had been adjudged that the Bank of Kentucky was only taxable under a law of the State, called the Hewitt law, and that such law constituted an inviolable contract between the bank and the State. And against the state taxes it was urged that the bank had ceased to exist by the repeal of its charter before liability under the Hewitt law attached.

1. By its original charter the Bank of Kentucky was required to pay twenty-five cents on each share of its stock in lieu of all other taxation.By an exercise of a power reserved the legislature increased this to fifty cents. By the Hewitt law it was provided that the banks in the Commonwealth should pay to the State seventy-five cents on each share of their capital stock outstanding, and the ordinary rate of state taxation on the amount of its profits less ten per cent thereof. The tax was to be in lieu of all local taxation, except upon the real estate occupied by the bank for the purpose of its business. It was provided that banks organized prior to its passage might accept

[ 207 U.S. Page 263]

     the terms of the law. If they failed to do so they were to be taxed as other corporations were taxed, and also should be subject to local taxation. The Bank of Kentucky accepted the terms and paid the taxes required. In 1891 Kentucky adopted a new constitution, which provided that all property of individuals and corporations should be taxed according to its value. In 1892, to enforce the provision of the constitution, the legislature passed a general revenue bill. Under the terms of the bill banks as well as other corporations are subject to taxation, and it is provided that their property at its fair cash value "shall be assessed and valued as of the 15th of September in the year listed, and the person owning or possessing the same on that day shall list it with the assessor, and remain bound for the tax, notwithstanding he may have sold or parted with the same." Corporations are also required to pay a tax on their franchise to the State and to the locality where the franchise is exercised, to be levied by a board denominated the Board of Valuation and Assessment, constituted of the auditor, treasurer and secretary. It is the duty of the board to determine the apportionment of the tax where more than one jurisdiction is entitled to a share of the tax and fix the place of its payment. The auditor is chairman of the board, and it is made his duty at the expiration of thirty days after the final determination of such values to certify to the county clerks the amount liable for local tax, who in turn certifies it to the local tax officer.

The judgment relied on as res judicata was entered in a suit brought by the Bank of Kentucky in the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Kentucky, wherein it impleaded Samuel H. Stone as the Auditor of Public Accounts of the State of Kentucky, Charles Fenley as the Secretary of State, and George W. Long as the Treasurer of State, the city of Louisville as a municipal corporation, the county of Franklin as a municipal corporation and the Board of Councilmen of the city of Frankfort as a municipal corporation.

The bill alleged the rights of the bank under the Hewitt law as a contract between it and the State, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.