Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK v. SAILBOAT APARTMENT CORP. ET AL.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


November 1, 1976

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
v.
SAILBOAT APARTMENT CORP. ET AL.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Reported below: 334 So. 2d 604.

[ 429 U.S. Page 911]

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for a determination of whether petitioner has waived protection of the venue provision of the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 94. See National Bank v. Associates of Obstetrics, 425 U.S. 460 (1976).

MR. JUSTICE STEVENS, with whom MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN joins, dissenting.

The Court's action in this case is not supported by the precedent on which it relies. In National Bank v. Associates of Obstetrics, 425 U.S. 460, the Utah Supreme Court erroneously held that 12 U.S.C. § 94 was "permissive and not exclusive." We remanded because that court had not reached the waiver issue in its previous opinion. In the present case, however, the state courts have given no explanation for their rejection of petitioner's venue claim. A remand in this case can only rest on the unwarranted assumption that the state courts relied on some ground other than waiver. The

[ 429 U.S. Page 912]

     presumption, however, should be that the state courts recognized and relied on the strongest argument in favor of their holding - in this case, the waiver argument.*fn*

 I am therefore unable to concur in the Court's summary action in this case. Since this case is unworthy of plenary review, I would deny certiorari.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.