Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

CONNECTICUT v. NEW HAMPSHIRE

decided: May 18, 1992.

CONNECTICUT, ET AL
v.
NEW HAMPSHIRE



Rehnquist, White, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas.

The motion of Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel for leave to intervene is referred to the Special Master. The motion of United Illuminating Company, et al. for leave to intervene is referred to the Special Master. Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

19920518

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.