Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Jancu

July 1, 2002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
LOUISE SHAUNAE JANCU SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 3883



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christina A. Snyder U. S. District Judge

AMENDED

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 7 01 2002

BRIAN NEWMAN, Appointed

WITH COUNSEL

(Name of Counsel)

GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO NOT GUILTY

CONTENDRE

There being a finding/verdict of x GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:

Bank Fraud in Violation of Title 18 USC 1344 (Count 1 of First Superseding Indictment), Class B Felony

The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of: FIVE (5) MONTHS. It is recommended that the defendant serve this term in a community corrections center in southern California.

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of five years under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;

The defendant shall participate for a period of 5 months in a home detention program which includes electronic monitoring and shall observe all rules of such program, as directed by the Probation Officer;

The defendant shall pay the costs of electronic monitoring to the contract vendor, not to exceed the sum of $4.60 for each day of participation in the electronic monitoring program. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer;

As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's psychiatric disorder to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision, pursuant to 18 USC 3672. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment; and

The defendant shall participate in a psychological/psychiatric counseling or treatment program, as approved and directed by the Probation

The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $246,094.89 pursuant to 18 USC 3663A. *The defendant and her convicted co-participants, Albert Edward Talton, Jonathan Christopher Slack, and Jennifer Elaine West, will be held jointly and severally liable for the total amount of restitution. A separate order as to the specifics of the restitution will follow and will be binding on defendants.

The amount of restitution ordered shall be paid as follows:

Amount Washington Mutual Bank $246,094.89 9200 Oakdale Ave. N110102 Chatsworth, CA 91311 ATT: Cesar ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.