Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

GRIGGS v. LOCKHEED MARTIN TACTICAL SYSTEMS

United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division


March 19, 2003

DANIEL GRIGGS AND BETTY GRIGGS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
LOCKHEED MARTIN TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney, United States District Judge.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT
WHEREAS, on December 17, 2002, Plaintiffs filed the instant action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco styled Daniel Griggs and Betty Griggs v. Lockheed Martin Tactical Systems, Inc., bearing case number 415817 ("Griggs").

WHEREAS, on February 12, 2003, Tobacco Defendants removed Griggs to this Court based on claimed diversity of citizenship and an amount in controversy in excess of $75,000.

WHEREAS, Tobacco Defendants have agreed to stipulate to a remand of Griggs to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco in exchange for Plaintiffs agreement that: (1) immediately upon the remand of Griggs, Plaintiffs will dismiss the action with prejudice as to each of the Tobacco Defendants and DNA Plant Technology Corporation ("DNAP"), their parent and affiliated companies, and their predecessor and successor companies, and in exchange for a mutual waiver of costs; and (2) Plaintiffs will not hereafter pursue any claims, whether or not previously filed, against the Tobacco Defendants and DNAP, their parent and affiliated companies, and their predecessor and successor companies, arising out of Daniel Griggs' medical condition, use of tobacco products or any conduct of the Tobacco Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and the Tobacco Defendants that:

1. This action shall be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco;

2. Immediately upon remand, Plaintiffs shall dismiss this action with prejudice as to each of the Tobacco Defendants and DNAP, their parent and affiliated companies, and their predecessor and successor companies only;

3. Tobacco Defendants and DNAP, their parent and affiliated companies, and their predecessor and successor companies, will waive all costs associated with this case;

4. Plaintiffs will waive all costs associated with this case as against Tobacco Defendants and DNAP; and

5. Plaintiffs will not hereafter pursue any claims against the Tobacco Defendants and DNAP, their parent and affiliated companies, and their predecessor and successor companies. arising out of or related to Daniel Griggs' use of tobacco products or any conduct by Tobacco Defendants and DNAP (including, their parent and affiliated companies, and their predecessor and successor companies) whether or not presently filed, including, but not limited to Daniel Griggs and Betty Griggs v. Asbestos Defendants (BHC) (San Francisco County Superior Court No. 411417).

The parties having so stipulated, the Court hereby orders that the above-captioned action be remanded to the Superior Court of the California, County of San Francisco.

IT IS SO ORDERED

20030319

© 1992-2003 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.