Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

LOVEL v. BARNHART

United States District Court, Northern District of California


March 31, 2003

MINDY LOVEL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JO ANN BARNHART, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Charles R. Breyer, United States District Judge.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This is an action challenging a denial of social security benefits. Defendant answered the complaint on August 9, 2002. Under the local rules, plaintiff was required to file a motion for summary judgment within 30 days of the filing of the government's answer. Plaintiff had not done so and therefore the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. In particular, the Court ordered plaintiff to file her motion for summary judgment by January 13, 2002. As of the date of this order plaintiff has not filed her motion and has not otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 for a lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED

20030331

© 1992-2003 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.