United States District Court, Northern District of California
April 10, 2003
NEOPOST LEASING, INC. PLAINTIFF, VS. SUNGARD RECOVERY SERVICES LP, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jeffrey S. White, United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Neopost Leasing, Inc. has resolved its differences with Defendant Sungard Recovery Services LP through an executed settlement agreement and mutual release of Claims and now wishes to the terminate this action with prejudice; and
WHEREAS, defendant has no objection to the termination of this action;
NOW, THEREFORE, upon the consent of the parties hereto, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the present action is dismissed with prejudice and each parties shall bear-its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in this action.
© 1992-2003 VersusLaw Inc.