United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 13, 2003
JOSEPH A. ALLDREDGE, PETITIONER,
GRAY DAVIS, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney, United States District Judge
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Petitioner, a California state prisoner, filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On April 4, 2003, the Court dismissed the petition because it did not set forth any cognizable claims, and critical information required by the Court's form for habeas petitions had not been included. Petitioner was granted leave to file an amended petition in this matter within thirty days to cure the deficiencies in his petition, and the Court cautioned that failure to do so would "result in the dismissal of this action." Petitioner has not filed an amended petition. Accordingly, the case is hereby DISMISSED. See WMX Technologies v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (holding further action by district court necessary where plaintiff fails to amend after dismissal with leave to amend).
All pending motions are terminated and the Clerk shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2003 VersusLaw Inc.