Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SMITH v. FORTE PROTECTIVE SERVICES

United States District Court, Northern District of California


June 4, 2003

FREDERICK E. SMITH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FORTE PROTECTIVE SERVICES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Susan Illston, United States District Judge

JUDGMENT

This case has been dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to notify the court of address change. Judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff is accordingly entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO NOTIFY COURT OF ADDRESS CHANGE
This Court has reviewed de novo the files and records in this case, and the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. This Court concurs in Judge James' findings and analysis; and finds that plaintiff Frederick E. Smith has failed properly to prosecute this action in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and has failed to notify the Court of his current address in violation of Local Rule 3-11.

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20030604

© 1992-2003 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.