Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SCHULTZ v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT

United States District Court, N.D. California


April 29, 2004.

BEVERLY SCHULTZ, Plaintiff,
v.
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, et al., Defendants

The opinion of the court was delivered by: MARILYN PATEL, Chief Judge, District

ORDER

On February 23, 2004, defendant San Francisco. Bay Area Rapid Transit District filed a motion for partial summary judgment with this court. Consistent with this court's local rules, a hearing on the motion was initially set for April 5, 2004. Under Local Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff Beverly Schultz was required to file any opposition to defendant's motion at least twenty-one (21) days before the hearing — that is, by March 15, 2004. See Local R. 7-3(a) ("Any opposition to a motion must be served and filed not less than 21 days before the hearing day."). On March 17, 2004, the court reset the hearing on the motion for April 19, 2004, expressly preserving the original briefing schedule. To date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition to defendant's motion, nor has it sought an enlargement of time in which to do so. The court has already taken the motion under submission without oral argument, and the court now deems the motion unopposed. Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is thus GRANTED as unopposed,

IT IS SO ORDERED.
20040429

© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.