United States District Court, N.D. California
August 4, 2004.
STEVE WOODRUFF, Petitioner,
JILL BROWN, Acting Warden, Respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: MAXINE CHESNEY, District Judge
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-titled habeas petition was filed April 15, 2004 by a
California prisoner proceeding pro se. That same date, the court
notified petitioner that the in forma pauperis application he
submitted was insufficient because he did not attach a copy of
his prisoner trust account statement showing transactions for the
last six months. A return envelope was provided to petitioner
with the notice. Petitioner was informed that if he did not
respond within thirty days, the case would be dismissed.
Petitioner has not responded. The action is therefore DISMISSED
The Clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a
trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has
rendered its verdict.
[X] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing
before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a
decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the action is DISMISSED without
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.