Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

WOODRUFF v. BROWN

United States District Court, N.D. California


August 4, 2004.

STEVE WOODRUFF, Petitioner,
v.
JILL BROWN, Acting Warden, Respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: MAXINE CHESNEY, District Judge

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The above-titled habeas petition was filed April 15, 2004 by a California prisoner proceeding pro se. That same date, the court notified petitioner that the in forma pauperis application he submitted was insufficient because he did not attach a copy of his prisoner trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months. A return envelope was provided to petitioner with the notice. Petitioner was informed that if he did not respond within thirty days, the case would be dismissed. Petitioner has not responded. The action is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending motions.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

  JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

  [] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

  [X] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

  IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

20040804

© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.