Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PLUMMER v. CADEN

United States District Court, N.D. California


August 9, 2004.

WILLIAM PIERCE PLUMMER, Petitioner,
v.
Warden CADEN, Respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: THELTON HENDERSON, Senior District Judge

JUDGMENT

The action is dismissed as legally frivolous.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINED "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE".] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

  William Plummer, a California prisoner incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. Plummer alleges in his petition that the United States District Court for the Central District of California erred in its ruling on his earlier habeas petition concerning his conviction in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. This court has no jurisdiction to review the decision of another federal district court. The action therefore must be dismissed as legally frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915A(b). This court will not entertain a habeas petition challenging the conviction in the Los Angeles County Superior Court (any such action belongs in the United States District Court for the Central District of California) or challenging a decision by another federal court. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20040809

© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.