United States District Court, N.D. California
August 9, 2004.
WILLIAM PIERCE PLUMMER, Petitioner,
Warden CADEN, Respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: THELTON HENDERSON, Senior District Judge
The action is dismissed as legally frivolous.
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINED "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE".] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
William Plummer, a California prisoner incarcerated at Salinas
Valley State Prison, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas
corpus. Plummer alleges in his petition that the United States
District Court for the Central District of California erred in
its ruling on his earlier habeas petition concerning his
conviction in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. This court
has no jurisdiction to review the decision of another federal
district court. The action therefore must be dismissed as legally
frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). This court will not
entertain a habeas petition challenging the conviction in the Los
Angeles County Superior Court (any such action belongs in the
United States District Court for the Central District of
California) or challenging a decision by another federal court.
The action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.