United States District Court, N.D. California
September 17, 2004.
ROBERT R. GUZMAN, Petitioner,
EDWARD J. CADEN, Respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: MAXINE CHESNEY, District Judge
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
(Docket No. 1)
Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed this pro se action on
June 29, 2004. On that same date, the Court notified petitioner
in writing that the action was deficient due to petitioner's
failure to pay the requisite filing fee or, instead, submit a
signed and completed court-approved in forma pauperis ("IFP")
application. Along with the notice, the Court sent to petitioner
copies of the Court's IFP application, instructions for
completing the application, and a stamped return envelope.
Petitioner was advised that failure to pay the filing fee or to
complete the IFP application within thirty days would result in
dismissal of this action. Petitioner has not responded.
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to
petitioner's filing a new action in which he either pays the
filing fee or completes an IFP application.
The Clerk shall close the file. This order terminates docket
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINED "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE".] JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a
trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has
rendered its verdict.
[X] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing
before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a
decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this action is DISMISSED without
prejudice to petitioner's filing a new action in which he either
pays the filing fee or completes an IFP application.
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.