United States District Court, S.D. California
August 18, 2005.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BRENICE HUGHES (3).
The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge
JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE
(For Revocation of Probation or Supervised Release)
(For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)
[x] admitted guilt to violation of allegation(s) No.
? was found in violation of allegation(s) No. ____
after denial of guilt.
ACCORDINGLY, the court has adjudicated that the defendant is
guilty of the following allegation(s):
Allegation Number Nature of Violation
1 Failure to complete punitive CCC placement (nv24)
2 Failure to participate in drug aftercare program (nv21)
The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2
of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the
Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States
attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name,
residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution,
costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully
paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant shall notify
the court and United States attorney of any material change in
the defendant's economic circumstances. IMPRISONMENT
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United
States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of SIX (6)
MONTHS AND THIRTY-SIX (36) DAYS
? The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau
? The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United
? The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal
for this district:
? at ____ ?a.m. ?p.m. on ____ as notified by the
United States Marshal.
? The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the
institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons:
? before ____
? as notified by the United States Marshal.
? as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services
I have executed this judgment as follows:
Defendant delivered on 9-7-2005 to mcc SAM Diegu at SAM
Diegu, with a certified copy of this judgment.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.