United States District Court, N.D. California
September 6, 2005.
IN re EXODUS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: MAXINE CHESNEY, District Judge
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR UNDERWRITER
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER THE CORRECTED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
WHEREAS the Corrected Third Amended Complaint ("Complaint") in
the above-captioned action was filed on April 29, 2005 and
electronically served on that date; and
WHEREAS the Court issued an Order on August 5, 2005 dismissing
some, but not all, of the claims asserted against the Underwriter
Defendants in the Complaint and instructing the Underwriter
Defendants to answer the Complaint by September 6, 2005; and
WHEREAS in consideration of the length of the Complaint (365
paragraphs), the Underwriter Defendants have requested as a
courtesy additional time to prepare their answer and the parties
have stipulated to extend the time for the Underwriter Defendants
to answer the Complaint in this action through and including
September 15, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE, and
request the Court to order, as follows: Defendants Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan
Stanley Dean Witter, and J.P. Morgan shall have up to and
including September 15, 2005 within which to file an answer to
The parties having stipulated to extend the time within which
defendants Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan
Stanley Dean Witter, and J.P. Morgan must answer the Corrected
Third Amended Complaint, and good cause appearing therefore, the
Court ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Absent further Order of the Court, defendants Goldman, Sachs &
Co., Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, and J.P.
Morgan shall answer the Corrected Third Amended Complaint by
September 15, 2005.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.