Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

WU GROUP v. SYNOPSYS

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division


September 6, 2005.

THE WU GROUP, et al., Plaintiff,
v.
SYNOPSYS, INC., AART DE GEUS, STEVEN K. SHEVICK, and RICHARD T. ROWLEY, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: MARTIN JENKINS, District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2005, plaintiffs Yeushyr Wu, Robert Wiederhold, Hosein Naaseh-Sahry, and Thomas Ratcliffe, individually and on behalf of the Sara Eastwood Family Trust (collectively the "Lead Plaintiff"), filed their Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the "Consolidated Complaint") in the above-titled action; and

WHEREAS, on March 25, 2005, defendants Synopsys, Inc., Aart J. de Geus, Steven K. Shevick, and Vicki L. Andrews (collectively "Defendants") filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint and also filed a motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and

  WHEREAS, on August 10, 2005, the Court entered an order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint without prejudice and denying Defendants' motion for sanctions; and

  WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to dismissal with prejudice in this action provided that each party bear his, her or its own costs and fees incurred in this action.

  NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court's approval, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate to the following:

  1. The Consolidated Complaint, and all claims contained therein, shall be dismissed with prejudice.

  2. Each party shall bear his, her or its own fees and costs.

  3. Final Judgment shall be entered in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

  IT IS SO STIPULATED. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

  Based upon the parties' stipulation for dismissal with prejudice and entry of final judgment, and good cause therefore appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:

  1. The Consolidated Complaint, and all claims contained therein, are dismissed with prejudice.

  2. Each party shall bear his, her or its own fees and costs.

  3. Final Judgment shall be entered in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

  I, Mark T. Oakes, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this document. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

20050906

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.