Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PEARSON v. AQUARIUM

September 15, 2005.

JACK PEARSON, Plaintiff
v.
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM, Defendant.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: JAMES WARE, District Judge

CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER

1. PLAINTIFF JACK PEARSON filed this action to enforce provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., and California civil rights laws against Defendant, MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION dba MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM (the "Aquarium" or "Defendant"). PLAINTIFF has alleged that Defendant violated Title III of the ADA, sections 54.1, and 55 of the California Civil Code; sections 19952 and 19955 et seq., of California Health and Safety Code; Government Code sections 4.450 et seq., including section 4456; and Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, by failing to provide full and equal access to the Aquarium, which is located in the City of Monterey, California, and related facilities. 2. Defendant has answered PLAINTIFF'S Complaint, denying all of plaintiff's allegations and by entering into this Consent Decree and Order does not admit liability for the matters alleged in PLAINTIFF'S Complaint filed in this action. The parties hereby enter into this Consent Decree and Order for the purpose of resolving the injunctive relief and monetary relief claims in this lawsuit without the need for protracted litigation, and without the admission of any liability.

  DEFENDANT'S DENIALS AND NO ADMISSION OF LIABILITY

  3. Defendant denies PLAINTIFF's allegations and, by entering into this Consent Decree, Order, And Judgment in no way admits to any liability whatsoever. In this regard, the parties enter into this Consent Decree, Order, And Judgment to amicably resolve all aspects of the Lawsuit without the need for further protracted litigation and to resolve all allegations raised in the Complaint on file herein. The parties agree that resolution of these matters without further litigation is in the public interest and that entry of this Order is the most appropriate means of resolving these matters. Accordingly, they agree to the entry of this Order without trial or further adjudication of any issues of fact or law.

  JURISDICTION AND VENUE:

  4. The parties agree that the Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 USC § 1331 for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 USC 12101 et seq. and pursuant to pendant jurisdiction for violations of California Health & Safety Code § 19955 et seq., including § 19959; Title 24 California Code of Regulations; and California Civil Code §§ 54; 54.1; § 54.3; and 55.

  5. Venue is proper in the Northern District of California, the judicial district in which the claims have arisen, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

  SETTLEMENT OF ON-GOING LITIGATION

  6. This Consent Decree And Order shall be a full, complete, and final disposition and settlement of all of PLAINTIFF's claims that have arisen out of the Complaint with respect to the Lawsuit. 7. The Parties jointly request that, following entry of the Consent Decree, Order, and Judgment set forth herein, the Court enter final judgment with respect to the Lawsuit.

  8. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to enforce the provisions of this Consent Decree And Order for four (4) years from the date of this Order.

  WHEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to the Court's entry of this Consent Decree and Order, which provides as follows:
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF:
  9. The parties agree and stipulate that all of the remedial measures and modifications set forth in Exhibit A as modified by its Addendum (Exhibit B), hereto will be performed in compliance with the standards and specifications for disabled access as set forth in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24-2 and Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, unless other standards are specifically agreed to in this Consent Decree and Order. These remedial measures shall be completed within the timeframes specified in Exhibits A and B hereto, which are expressly incorporated by referenced herein.

  The parties hereto make no representations or warranties as to the accessibility of facilities, exhibits and other features of the Aquarium that are not specifically addressed in this Agreement or Exhibits A and B hereto. Such facilities, exhibits and other features are not part of this Settlement Agreement and Consent Decree.

  DAMAGES AND ATTORNEY FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES AND COSTS

  10. Defendant shall pay to PLAINTIFF the sum of ninety thousand dollars ($90,000) for all damages of PLAINTIFF (including but not limited to physical injuries) and all Attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and costs of PLAINTIFF. Said $90,000 payment is to be made payable to "Thimesch Law Offices, in trust for JACK PEARSON" and is to be dated and mailed (postmarked) or delivered to Thimesch Law Offices, 171 Front Street, Suite 102, Danville, CA 94526 no later than fifteen ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.