United States District Court, S.D. California
September 20, 2005.
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Plaintiff,
BROADCOM CORPORATION, Defendants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: RUDI BREWSTER, Senior District Judge
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE AND RESCHEDULING
On September 2, 2005, Defendant Broadcom Corporation filed an
Ex Parte Application for an Order Shortening Time, pursuant to
Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.5, for hearing and schedule for filing
papers on its Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to
Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, or alternatively, its Motion to Stay Pending
Resolution of a Prior Pending Case. On September 6, 2005, the
Court rejected the Ex Parte application and informed both
parties that the Court will hear Plaintiff Qualcomm's Application
for a Preliminary Injunction and Defendant Broadcom's Motions to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion to Stay on
October 3, 2005. On September 2, 2005, Defendant Broadcom
Corporation also moved, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.G.2, to
continue the briefing and hearing on Plaintiff Qualcomm's
Application for a Preliminary Injunction to Enforce Forum
Selection Agreement until after the Court decided Broadcom's
motions. Because the Court desires to hear all of these motions
on the same day, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant Broadcom's
Motion to Continue pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.G.2.
The motions for this case, currently scheduled to be heard on
October 3, 2005, are hereby rescheduled to Friday, October 7, at
9 a.m. in Courtroom Two.
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.