Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MOLSKI v. TORO PETROLEUM; PDP INVESTMENTS

United States District Court, N.D. California


September 20, 2005.

JAREK MOLSKI an individual; and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit corporation, Plaintiffs,
v.
TORO PETROLEUM; PDP INVESTMENTS, INC., a California corporation; PETE PEREZ, JR., an individual; and TORO PETROLEUM CORP., a California corporation, dba GONZALES UNOCAL 76, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and General Release ("Agreement"), each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

  This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one original document.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20050920

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.