IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 3, 2005
MARCIANO PLATA, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS,
ARNOLD SCHWARTZENEGGER, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thelton E. Henderson United States District Judge
ORDER APPOINTING COURT EXPERT
For the reasons set forth in this Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, filed simultaneously herewith, and in light of the on-going, life threatening nature of the constitutional violations at issue in this matter, the Court concludes that the appointment of a Correctional Expert is appropriate to assist the Court in identifying discrete, urgently needed, remedial measures that can be undertaken immediately without interfering with the comprehensive and systemic reform that the Receiver necessarily will undertake. As set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this expert shall not serve in the capacity of a Receiver or Temporary Receiver, and shall not have the powers and responsibilities associated with such positions.*fn1 Rather, the expert shall be limited to the following tasks during the interim period pending appointment of the Receiver:
A. Meeting and conferring with counsel for the parties, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation ("CDCR") officials, and representatives of the Coalition of CDCR Healthcare Unions, concerning concrete measures that can be undertaken to address the following issues without interfering with the comprehensive and systemic reform that the Receiver necessarily will undertake
(1) Providing critical clinical staff, including physicians, mid-level providers, and nursing personnel, at those institutions with the greatest immediate need.
(2) Ensuring that timely and adequate peer review and, if necessary, formal investigations, are commenced by CDCR officials following the serious injury or death of a prisoner patient.
B. Recommending the appointment of additional experts that may be necessary to assist the Correctional Expert in carrying out his duties under this order.
C. Directing the activities of the Court's Medical Experts with respect to those efforts necessary to permit the Correctional Expert to carry out his duties under this order.
D. Preparing and submitting recommendation(s) to the Court with respect to proposed remedial orders concerning the items identified in paragraph A above.
The Court finds that the above appointment is narrowly drawn to remedy the constitutional violations at issue, extends no further than necessary to correct a current and ongoing violation of a federal right, and is the least intrusive means necessary to correct these violations. The Court also is amply satisfied that this relief will impose no unnecessary burden on defendants and will have no adverse impact on either the safety of the public or the operation of the criminal justice system.
Accordingly, and good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The Court appoints John Hagar*fn2 to serve as a Correctional Expert to the Court, pending appointment of a Receiver, to undertake the tasks set forth above in this Order.
2. All parties and court appointed experts shall fully cooperate with Mr. Hagar, including providing him with documents and access to CDCR personnel as needed to carry out this Order. Mr. Hagar shall immediately report to the Court in the event that he encounters any lack of cooperation.
3. Given the urgent nature of the issues, Mr. Hagar shall meet and confer with the parties and representatives of the Coalition of CDCR Healthcare Unions no later than Tuesday, October 11, 2005. He shall contact the parties with respect to coordinating the specific meeting times and formats.
4. Mr. Hagar shall provide a status report to the Court no later than 21 days from the date of this Order and shall provide follow-up status reports to the Court as necessary thereafter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.