Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PANIGADA v. GMC

October 3, 2005.

JAMES PANIGADA, Plaintiff,
v.
GMC, aka GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: CHARLES BREYER, District Judge

ORDER OF REMAND

Plaintiff filed a complaint in state court alleging a products liability cause of action against defendant on July 13, 2005. On September 7, 2005, defendant filed a Notice of Removal with this Court pursuant to diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). In that notice, defendant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the a amount-in-controversy exceeded $75,000, the amount required to invoke diversity jurisdiction. See Sanchez v. Monumental Life Ins. Co., 102 F.3d 398, 404 (9th Cir. 1996). The Court filed an Order to Show Cause as to the amount-in-controversy on September 13, 2005. On September 22, 2005, defendant filed a Response to the Order to Show Cause in which it conceded that it could not show that the amount-in-controversy would exceed $75,000. As a result, defendant has failed to meet its burden to remove the matter to federal court under diversity jurisdiction. "Where doubt regarding the right to removal exists, a case should be remanded to state court." Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co., 319 F.3d 1089, 1090 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, this case is hereby REMANDED to state court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051003

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.