United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
October 5, 2005.
RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff,
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A., INOTERA MEMORIES, INC., Defendants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: RONALD WHYTE, District Judge
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF INOTERA MEMORIES,
INC. AND WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER
Plaintiff Rambus Inc. and Defendant Inotera Memories, Inc.
hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that all claims in Rambus' First
Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Jury Demand, filed
June 6, 2005, shall be and hereby are dismissed as to Inotera
Memories, Inc. without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.
41(a)(1), with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and
costs. Accordingly, Rambus and Inotera respectfully request that
the Court enter an Order to that effect. Rambus' claims against
the other Defendants are not affected and remain pending. Rambus
and Inotera further stipulate and request that the Court vacate
the hearing scheduled for October 14, 2005 on Inotera's pending
motion to dismiss, which is hereby withdrawn. Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section
X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that
concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.