Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

DAVIS v. KMART HOLDING COMPANY

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division


October 7, 2005.

JOYCELYN DAVIS, Plaintiff,
v.
KMART HOLDING COMPANY, a corporation dba KMART and KMART SUPERSTORES, and DOES ONE THROUGH TWENTY, Inclusive, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: WAYNE BRAZIL, Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION TO DISMISS CIVIL ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON
[Rule 41, FRCP]
Notice is hereby given that the parties to the above-entitled civil action through their counsel of record hereby stipulate to entry of an immediate order dismissing this civil action in its entirety with prejudice. ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION TO DISMISS CIVIL ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

  [Rule 41, FRCP]

  Pursuant to Stipulation:

  IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and hereby closed and removed from the active calendar of this Court.

20051007

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.