Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SINGLETARY v. RUIZ

United States District Court, S.D. California


October 18, 2005.

DAVID SINGLETARY, et al, Plaintiff,
v.
EZEQUIEL P. RUIZ, JR, et al, Defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: BARRY MOSKOWITZ, District Judge

JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL BY COURT UNDER RULE 4(m) F.R.Civ.P. FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
The above-entitled cause, having come before the court on a calendar called pursuant to notice under Rule 4(m), F.R.Civ.P. for failure to serve process, and it appearing to the court that the summons and complaint have not been served, and no extension of time to serve has been requested, therefore,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-entitled cause is hereby dismissed as to all defendant(s) without prejudice, for want of prosecution, with leave to reopen within 30 days upon showing that the complaint was served on/or before October 18, 2005.

20051018

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.