Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

TRANCHITA v. CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT

October 24, 2005.

MIKE A. TRANCHITA, Plaintiff,
v.
CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER PADILLA, CONTRA COSTA JAIL OFFICER POLLER, DETECTIVE STODDARD, Defendants.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: JEFFREY WHITE, District Judge

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On April 11, 2005, the Court dismissed the complaint in this civil rights case but granted Plaintiff thirty days to amend the complaint to state a cognizable claim. The court notified Plaintiff that failure to amend by the designated time would result in a dismissal of the case. Plaintiff has not filed any amendment. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 633 (1962); McKeever v. Block, 932 F.2d 795, 797 (9th Cir. 1991). The clerk shall close the file and enter judgment in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051024

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.