Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. PETROMARK

United States District Court, N.D. California


October 24, 2005.

RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff,
v.
PETROMARK, INC., a California corporation; GEORGE E. KOPPEL, individually; GROSVENOR E. BRYANT, individually; ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; ASHLAND, INC., a Kentucky corporation; TIME OIL CO., a Washington corporation; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., a Delaware corporation; and CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: PHYLLIS HAMILTON, District Judge

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS, CROSS CLAIMS, COUNTER CLAIMS AND THIRD PARTY CLAIMS AND ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties of this action through their designated counsel that the entire above captioned action (including all claims, counter claims, cross claims and third party claims) be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). All parties shall bear their own attorney's fees, expert fees and costs, except as may otherwise be set forth in various settlement agreements among the parties and as set forth below. Ashland shall forthwith file a request for dismissal with prejudice of its Ninth Circuit appeal relating to this action. Notwithstanding such dismissal, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties who have entered into settlement memoranda and/or settlement agreements in this matter (collectively `Settlement Agreements') and over the subject matter of this action, for purposes of enforcing the Settlement Agreements.

  Also, nothing in this Stipulation alters the respective rights, if any, of ConocoPhillips Company and Honeywell International, Inc. under the Settlement Agreement in the above-captioned action solely as against each other with respect to the apportionment between them of (i) the $140,000 settlement sum paid by them to the Plaintiff pursuant to the Settlement Agreement or (ii) fees and costs paid by them in connection with the above-captioned action.

20051024

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.