United States District Court, N.D. California
October 25, 2005.
King Vision Pay-Per-View, Ltd., Plaintiff,
James A. Dailey, et al. Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AGAINST
DEFENDANT JAMES A. DAILEY, individually and d/b/a GOLDEN BEAR
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff KINGVISION
PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD. and Defendant JAMES A. DAILEY, individually
and d/b/a GOLDEN BEAR SPORT BAR, that the above-entitled action
is hereby dismissed without prejudice against James A. Dailey,
individually and d/b/a GOLDEN BEAR SPORT BAR subject to the
Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached
between the Parties. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced
above has filed a motion to reopen this action by December 1,
2005, this Court shall not have jurisdiction to set aside the
dismissal and the dismissal as to Defendant James A. Dailey,
individually and d/b/a Golden Bear Sport Bar shall be deemed to
be with prejudice.
This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure 41(a)(1), Each Party referenced-above shall bear its
own attorneys' fees and costs.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement
agreement only through December 23, 2005.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.