Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

G&G SPECIALTY FOODS, INC. v. PACK LINE CORP.

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division


November 1, 2005.

G&G SPECIALTY FOODS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
PACK LINE CORP., a foreign profit corporation, Defendant. PACK LINE CORP, a foreign profit corporation, Counterclaimant, v. G&G SPECIALTY FOODS, INC., a California corporation, Counterdefendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: SAUNDRA ARMSTRONG, District Judge

AMENDED STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff/Counterdefendant G&G Specialty Foods, Inc. ("G&G") and Defendant/Counterclaimant Pack Line Corp. ("Pack Line"), through their designated counsel, that all remaining claims and counterclaims asserted in this action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1) and (c) based upon the settlement of the parties hereto. All parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees pursuant to their separately executed Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release.

  The parties consent to and request that Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen retain continuing exclusive jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter hereto for the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the August 29, 2005 Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release.

  STIPULATED AND AGREED: [PROPOSED] ORDER

  The parties, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case, including all claims and counterclaims, and having entered into a Stipulation of Dismissal,

  IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, upon the consent of the parties hereto, that:

  1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of and the parties hereto and venue is properly laid in this district.

  2. By the parties' consent and request, Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen shall retain continuing exclusive jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter hereto for the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the August 29, 2005 Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release.

  4. All remaining claims and counterclaims asserted in this action are dismissed with prejudice.

  5. Each of the parties hereto shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in this action.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051101

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.