United States District Court, N.D. California
December 5, 2005.
EAST BAY AUTOMOTIVE MACHINISTS LODGE NO. 1546, MACHINISTS AUTOMOTIVE TRADES DISTRICT LODGE 190, Plaintiff,
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: MAXINE CHESNEY, District Judge
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; VACATING
Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment filed
November 10, 2005 by defendant National Labor Relations Board
("the NLRB"). Plaintiff East Bay Automotive Machinists Lodge No.
1546, Machinists Automotive Trades District Lodge 190 ("East
Bay") has filed opposition to the motion; the NLRB has filed a
reply. Having considered the papers filed in support of and in
opposition to the NLRB's motion, the Court finds the matter
appropriate for decision without oral argument, see Civil L.R.
7-1(a), and hereby VACATES the December 16, 2005 hearing.
For the reasons set forth in the NLRB's motion and reply, the
Advice Memorandum at issue is exempt from disclosure pursuant to
Exemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act. See
5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5); see also NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.,
421 U.S. 132, 159-60 (1975) (holding NLRB Advice Memoranda directing
filing of complaint constitute attorney work product protected from disclosure under Exemption
5); Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc., 462 U.S. 19, 20,
28 (1983) (holding attorney work product exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 5 "without regard to the status of the litigation
for which it was prepared").
Accordingly, NLRB's motion for summary judgment is hereby
The Clerk shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.