Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HENRY v. ASBESTOS

United States District Court, N.D. California


December 14, 2005.

ROGER HENRY, Plaintiff,
v.
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B?P), Defendants. THE BOEING COMPANY, Removing Defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: PHYLLIS HAMILTON, District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND REMAND TO STATE COURT
WHEREAS:
1. This case was originally filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco; and

  2. Defendant THE BOEING COMPANY filed its Notice of Removal on December 5, 2005, alleging that this Court has removal jurisdiction pursuant to the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442(a)(1), on the ground that it was acting under the direction of agencies and officers of the United States government in committing the acts that Plaintiff complains of; and 3. The removal by defendant THE BOEING COMPANY did not require the consent of other party defendants and no consent or joinder in the removal was submitted to the court; and

  4. The parties have agreed to and do hereby stipulate that defendant THE BOEING COMPANY should be dismissed with prejudice from the above entitled action, pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2), each party to bear its own costs;

  IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel, that because the sole removing defendant is hereby dismissed with prejudice, no basis currently exists for this court to exercise jurisdiction over this action and remand to the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco is appropriate.

  Accordingly, the parties petition this court for an order dismissing defendant THE BOEING COMPANY from this action, and remanding the action to the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco. ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT AND REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT

  Having considered the stipulation between the plaintiff and the sole removing party, and good cause appearing:

  IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sole removing defendant, THE BOEING COMPANY, is dismissed with prejudice from this action pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2), each party to bear its own costs; and

  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the sole removing defendant having been dismissed with prejudice from the case, no basis currently exists for removal of this action from the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco, and this matter should be and is, therefore, remanded to that court immediately.

20051214

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.