UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 16, 2006
ANDREW E. ROTH, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF MMC BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. PLAINTIFF,
GREGORY REYES, MICHAEL BYRD, ANTONIO CANOVA, JACK CUTHBERT, AND BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
WHEREAS, Brocade's response to the Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Complaint") is currently due May 15, 2006;
WHEREAS, Brocade wishes to extend the time to respond to the Complaint and plaintiff does not object;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the deadline for Brocade to respond to the Complaint shall be continued until June 5, 2006.
Dated: May 15, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Mark T. Oakes Attorneys for Nominal Defendant
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
Dated: May 15, 2006 SCHUBERT & REED LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 788-4220
Willem F. Jonckheer
Robert C. Schubert
Willem F. Jonckheer Local Counsel for Plaintiff
Paul D. Wexler BRAGAR WEXLER & EAGEL, P.C. 885 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 308-5858
Glenn F. Ostrager OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY & BROITMAN P.C. 250 Park Avenue New York, New York 10177-0899 Telephone: (212) 681-0600 Counsel for Plaintiff
Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the deadline for Brocade to respond to the Complaint is continued until June 5, 2006.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.