Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tarver v. ADR Process Sandia Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 28, 2006

EDWARD EARL TARVER III, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ADR PROCESS SANDIA CORP.; JAMES WANG; AND DOES 1--20, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: William Alsup United States District Judge

ORDER RE SELECTING

Plaintiff Edward Earl Tarver III and at least one defendant request referral to private alternative dispute resolution without identifying the process or provider. They also ask that the Court not require a deadline for the ADR session. They want to defer these issues until after certain discovery. The requests are DENIED. The parties should resubmit the stipulation and proposed order, naming the provider, identifying the process and requesting a deadline. See Order Setting Initial Case Mgmt. Conference & ADR Deadlines; Civil L. R. 16-8(c); ADR L.R. 3-5(c). The stipulation to ADR process was due July 21, 2006. The parties should submit the corrected stipulation and proposed order by NOON, TUESDAY, AUGUST 1, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED

20060728

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.