Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

UniRAM Technology, Inc. v. Monolithic System Technology

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 28, 2006

UNIRAM TECHNOLOGY, INC., PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
MONOLITHIC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, INC, ET AL., DEFENDANT(S).

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-elena James United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court For the Northern District of California

ORDER RE TSMC'S INTERROGATORY No. 19

The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint discovery dispute letter, dated September 19, 2006. (Doc. #242.) In the letter, TSMC requests an order compelling UniRAM to respond to TSMC's Interrogatory No. 19, which requires UniRAM to describe in detail how it believes TSMC or MoSys misappropriated its alleged trade secrets. While this information is clearly relevant, Judge Walker ordered UniRAM to pare down its list of trade secrets from 212 to 12 by October 20, 2006. (Doc. #198.) Accordingly, the Court finds TSMC's request premature. If a dispute remains after October 20, the parties shall again meet and confer on this issue and thereafter file a joint letter if unable to resolve their dispute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20060928

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.