Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Oertle v. Washington Mutual and S&P Capital Investments
March 14, 2007
BRADFORD OERTLE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WASHINGTON MUTUAL AND S&P CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz United States District Judge
JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff Bradford Oertle and defendant CitiFinancial Services, Inc., successor to Washington Mutual Finance, Inc. (incorrectly sued herein as Washington Mutual), jointly move that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's
DATED: March 13, 2007 HYDE & SWIGART
Attorneys for Plaintiff BRADFORD OERTLE
DATED: March 13, 2007 SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation /s/ Regina J. McClendon By:
Regina J. McClendon Attorneys for Defendant CITIFINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., successor to Washington Mutual Finance, Inc., incorrectly sued herein as Washington Mutual
Pursuant to the joint motion of the parties, this case is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...