UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 12, 2007
FELIX ESPINO, PLAINTIFF,
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: William Q. Hayes United States District Judge
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, alleges that his constitutional rights were violated by members of the Chula Vista Police Department during his May 17, 2004 arrest. On January 31, 2007, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint, alleging for the first time that during his arrest, he sustained a back injury. Plaintiff alleged that he only learned of the back injury when X-rays revealed the damage during a recent visit to the doctor. On March 7, 2007, this Court found that this information was sufficient to show "good cause" for Plaintiff's delay in seeking amendment, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b),*fn1 and therefore the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint no later than April 10, 2007.
On April 6, 2007, Plaintiff filed a new Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint, along with a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. # 57-58.) The First Amended Complaint contains allegations about the alleged back injury, as allowed by the Court's March 7, 2007 Order. However, the First Amended Complaint also purports to add two new parties to this suit, an issue which was not raised in Plaintiff's January 31, 2007 Motion for Leave to Amend and was not addressed in the Court's March 7, 2007 Order.
Defendants may file an opposition to Plaintiff's April 6, 2007 Motion for Leave to Amend no later than April 27, 2007. Should Defendants file an opposition, Plaintiff may file a reply to that response no later than May 11, 2007. The Court then will take the matter under submission without oral argument. Defendants are not required to file an answer or otherwise respond to the April 6, 2007 First Amended Complaint until after the Court rules on the April 6, 2007 Motion for Leave to Amend.