Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hilderman v. ENEA Teksci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 1, 2007

VANCE HILDERMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; HIGHRELY, INC., A DELAWARE CORP. PLAINTIFF,
v.
ENEA TEKSCI, INC. DBA, ENEA EMBEDDED TECHNOLOGY DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia U.S. Magistrate Judge

Defendants/Counter-Claimants Order Denying as Moot Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 65] and related counter claims.

Defendants/Counter-claimants filed a Motion to Compel and request for attorney fees incurred in bringing the instant motion under Rule 37(a)(4). Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 37(a)(4). Plaintiff/Counter- defendants filed an Opposition and Defendants/Counter-claimants filed a Reply. The hearing set for 3:30 p.m. on April 27, 2007 before Judge Battaglia, is vacated. As a result of the parties contacting and informing the Court that they have stipulated to a resolution of the discovery dispute, the Court hereby

DENIES AS MOOT Defendants/Counter-claimants motion, Doc. No. 65.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20070501

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.