UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 1, 2007
VANCE HILDERMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; HIGHRELY, INC., A DELAWARE CORP. PLAINTIFF,
ENEA TEKSCI, INC. DBA, ENEA EMBEDDED TECHNOLOGY DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia U.S. Magistrate Judge
Defendants/Counter-Claimants Order Denying as Moot Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 65] and related counter claims.
Defendants/Counter-claimants filed a Motion to Compel and request for attorney fees incurred in bringing the instant motion under Rule 37(a)(4). Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 37(a)(4). Plaintiff/Counter- defendants filed an Opposition and Defendants/Counter-claimants filed a Reply. The hearing set for 3:30 p.m. on April 27, 2007 before Judge Battaglia, is vacated. As a result of the parties contacting and informing the Court that they have stipulated to a resolution of the discovery dispute, the Court hereby
DENIES AS MOOT Defendants/Counter-claimants motion, Doc. No. 65.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.