The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hayes, Judge
The matter before the Court is the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed by Paul Guevarra Macalma. (Doc. # 1.)
Petitioner Paul Guevarra Macalma is a native and citizen of the Philippines. Petitioner was born in Manila on April 24, 1981. Petitioner's father Benjamin Macalma left the Philippines and was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident on December 31, 1981. Benjamin Macalma became a United States citizen by naturalization on June 18, 1993.
On November 16, 1996, Petitioner entered the United States as a lawful permanent resident.
On September 20, 2000, Petitioner was convicted in California state court of receiving stolen property in violation of California Penal Code §496(a) and "sentenced to three years of probation which was formally revoked on September 16, 2003." (Government's Return, Doc. # 6 at 3.)
On November 20, 2003, the Department of Homeland Security took custody of Petitioner and placed him in removal proceedings. Based upon his September 20, 2000 conviction for receiving stolen property, Petitioner was charged with deportability under Section 237(a)(2)(A)(i) for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude committed within five years after admission for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed. In the hearing before the Immigration Judge, Petitioner claimed United States citizenship by acquisition through his naturalized father.
On March 10, 2004, the Immigration Judge found that Petitioner was not a citizen and ordered him removed to the Philippines. Petitioner filed an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals.
On October 22, 2004, the Board of Immigration Appeals upheld the decision of the Immigration Judge that Petitioner had not derived citizenship through his father under former section 321 of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1432(a).
On November 16, 2004, Petitioner filed a Petition for Review in the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit along with a motion to stay deportation pending resolution of the appeal. Macalma v. Gonzales, No. 04-75821.
On June 14, 2005, Respondents filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal.
On August 5, 2005, the Court of Appeals filed an order which appears in the docket in part as follows: "respondent has filed a statement of non-opp to mtn for stay of removal; temporary stay of removal continues in effect until the issuance of the mdt or further order of the ct." (Docket # 6, Exhibit 12 at 5.)
On February 27, 2006, Petitioner filed his opening brief in the Court of Appeals along with a motion for appointment of counsel.
On March 21, 2006, the Court of Appeals denied the motion for appointment of counsel and ordered Respondents to file an ...