Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Miller v. Ram

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 8, 2007

CARIDAD MILLER, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF INFOSONICS CORP., PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSEPH RAM, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. William McCurine, Jr. U.S. Magistrate Judge United States District Court

ORDER

On June 8, 2007, the Court held a telephonic status conference regarding the existing discovery dispute in the above captioned case. After hearing from counsel, reviewing the letter briefs, and based upon the applicable law, the Court issues the following Order:

1. The Court finds that folders numbered two and three, submitted by defendant, do not contain discoverable material on the jurisdiction issue.

2. The Court finds that folder numbered one, submitted by defendant, does contain some discoverable material on the jurisdiction issue. Specifically, the Court has highlighted that information which it finds discoverable.

3. On or before June 13, 2007, counsel for defendant shall photocopy the newly redacted documents and disclose that discovery to plaintiff. The originals shall be returned to the Court.

4. Defendant agrees, and it is the order of this Court, that Mr. Marx will make himself available for a telephonic deposition at defendant's expense if defendant proceeds with its motion regarding personal jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20070608

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.