UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 18, 2007
TRIPLE AAA ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SUING ON BEHALF OF MEMBER DEMETRIO, PLAINTIFF,
RODRIGUEZ CLAUDIA DBA ARMANDOS TACO SHOP 2, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT [Doc. #5]
On November 15, 2006, Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging discriminatory practices in public accommodations encountered by Plaintiff's member Demetrio upon visiting Armandos Taco Shop 2. On April 5, 2007, Defendant filed an answer to the complaint. On May 7, 2007, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend its complaint in order to add the landlord of the subject property and to clarify the pleadings, including correcting the named parties. No brief was filed in opposition to Plaintiff's motion. The motion came on for hearing on June 15, 2007 and was taken under submission. The Court finds that this matter is suitable for determination without oral argument pursuant to CivLR 7.1(d)(1).
Leave to amend a complaint is to be "freely given when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a); accord Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2003). In the absence of any reason such as undue delay, bad faith or, most importantly, prejudice to the opposing party, "there exists a presumption under Rule 15(a) in favor of granting leave to amend." Id. at 1052. The Court finds that the newly added Defendants will suffer no prejudice from being added at this early stage of the litigation, and the previously named Defendant has not opposed the motion. Since no reason exists to deny Plaintiff's request, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to amend its complaint. Plaintiff is directed to file a First Amended Complaint, in the form submitted to the Court as an exhibit to its motion, within 10 days of entry of this order and to serve that complaint upon all Defendants without delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.