The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge
Complaint Filed: August 22, 2007 Trial Date: None Set
STIPULATION AND  ORDER RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR PRELIMINARY
Plaintiff, Verigy US, Inc. ("Verigy"), by and through its counsel of record, Bergeson, LLP and Defendants Romi Omar Mayder, an individual, Wesley Mayder, an individual, Silicon Test Systems, Inc. a California Corporation, Silicon Test Solutions, LLC ("Defendants") by and through their counsel of record, Mount & Stoelker, PC, do hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS this Court issued an order on August 24, 2007 (Order Granting Plaintiff Verigy US, Inc.'s Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order Authoring Expedited Discovery; Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction) ("the Order"); and
WHEREAS this Court issued an order on September 19, 2007 modifying the Briefing Schedule and hearing on the order to show cause re: preliminary injunction (Docket No. 33); and
WHEREAS the parties now wish to modify the September 19, 2007 Order, and request court approval of the following hearing and briefing schedule:
1. The hearing on the order to appear and show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be entered against Defendants shall be continued to Friday, December 14, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the Court may hear the matter.
2. Plaintiff shall file and serve any reply and/or supplemental papers of up to twenty-five 5:00 p.m.
(25) pages in support of its motion for preliminary injunction by November 16, 2007 at
3. Defendants may file and serve a sur-reply of up to seventeen (17) pages in support of 22 p.m. its opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction by November 30, 2007 at 5:00
4. In all other respects, the Order remains in effect and is extended until the Court enters a 26 prior to that date and time, the Order is vacated or extended by this court for good cause decision on the preliminary injunction set for hearing on December 14, 2007 unless shown, or unless Plaintiff and Defendants stipulate to such extension or vacation, such stipulation being subject to the court's approval.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Dated: October 19, 2007 BERGESON, LLP 7 Melinda M. Morton, Esq. Attorneys ...