Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hindi v. Exxonmobil Oil Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 30, 2007

MAZEN HINDI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hayes, Judge

ORDER CONSTRUING STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDMENT TO ANSWER AS JOINT MOTION TO FILE AMENDMENT TO ANSWER AND GRANTING JOINT MOTION

On August 22, 2007, Defendant Exxonmobil Oil Corporation (Exxonmobil) removed this action to this Court. (Doc. # 1). Before filing the notice of removal, Defendant Exxonmobil had previously answered Plaintiff Mazen Hindi's Complaint while the case was pending in California State Superior Court.

On October 19, 2007, the parties filed a stipulation to allow Defendant Exxonmobil to file an amended answer. (Doc. # 7). The Court construes the stipulation (Doc. # 7) as a joint motion to allow Defendant Exxonmobil to file an amended answer. See Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, § 2(f)(4).

Good cause appearing, the joint motion (Doc. # 7) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file an amended answer, which shall be complete in itself, on or before Friday, November 30, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM Q. HAYES United States District Judge

20071030

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.