UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 28, 2007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
CURTIS RICHMOND, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge
ORDER DECLINING TO RULE ON EMERGENCY PETITION
On or about November 26, 2007 Defendant filed a document entitled "Petitioner/Defendant's Emergency Petition to Court to Rule According to Law that His 6 Month Sentence in Custody Had Been Served." The court declines to act upon Defendant's request. Defendant appears to request that the court administratively determine that he has completed his "custodial sentence." The court notes, preliminarily, that a custodial sentence was not imposed in this case; rather, Defendant was placed on home confinement as a special condition of probation. The court further notes that it is not the role of the court to calculate whether Defendant has completed his home confinement. That is a matter for Probation. Should a genuine issue develop on the question of whether Defendant has successfully completed six months of home confinement, then any such issue may be addressed by the court. In any event, the court suggests that Defendant contact his Probation Officer to discuss any concern related to his request.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.