UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 4, 2007
PULSE-LINK INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF,
TZERO TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge
ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
On December 3, 2007 the parties filed a Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. To obtain an extension of time to respond to complaint, the moving party must show good cause. Civ. L. Rule 12.1. The parties base their request on recent substitution of counsel for Defendant. The court's docket at this time does not include any application for substitution of counsel. Accordingly, the joint motion for extension of time to respond to complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Should the parties renew their request, they shall include the initial due date for Defendant's response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.