Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pulse-Link Inc. v. Tzero Technologies

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 4, 2007

PULSE-LINK INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TZERO TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

On December 3, 2007 the parties filed a Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. To obtain an extension of time to respond to complaint, the moving party must show good cause. Civ. L. Rule 12.1. The parties base their request on recent substitution of counsel for Defendant. The court's docket at this time does not include any application for substitution of counsel. Accordingly, the joint motion for extension of time to respond to complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Should the parties renew their request, they shall include the initial due date for Defendant's response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20071204

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.