Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Johnson

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


December 11, 2007

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PRINCE THEO JOHNSON, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States Chief District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING FROM DECEMBER 12, 2007 TO JANUARY 16, 2008 AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

The matter is presently on this Court's calendar for a status conference on December 12, 2007.

Information has just surfaced this morning that has changed the position of the parties. Accordingly, more time is necessary for both parties to complete their investigation.

The parties therefore stipulate and request the Court to continue the sentencing date from December 12, 2007 to January 16, 2008, in order to complete their investigation. Given the need to complete the necessary investigation, the parties stipulate that the time from December 12, 2007 to January 16, 2008, is properly excludable for effective preparation and continuity of counsel.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The sentencing hearing will be continued from December 12, 2007 to January 16, 2008. For the reasons set forth above, the time is excludable from the Speedy Trial Act on the grounds of effective preparation and continuity of counsel.

20071211

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.