Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Arista Records LLC v. Does 1 - 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 20, 2007

ARISTA RECORDS LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; BMG MUSIC, A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; FONOVISA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; INTERSCOPE RECORDS, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; LAFACE RECORDS LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; MAVERICK RECORDING COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA JOINT VENTURE; MOTOWN RECORD COMPANY, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; PRIORITY RECORDS LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, A DELAWARE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; AND ZOMBA RECORDING LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
DOES 1 - 43, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Louisa S Porter United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE IMMEDIATE DISCOVERY [Doc. No. 3]

On December 17, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against the Doe Defendants for copyright infringement, alleging that Defendants, without authorization, used an online media distribution system to download Plaintiffs' copyrighted works and/or distribute copyrighted works to the public. Plaintiffs do not know the names of the Doe Defendants, but have identified each Defendant by a unique Internet Protocol address assigned to that Defendant on the date and time of that Defendant's infringing activity. Simultaneous to their complaint, Plaintiffs have filed an Ex Parte Application seeking leave of the Court to serve immediate discovery on a third party Internet Service Provider ("ISP"), SBC Internet Services, Inc. ("SBC"), to identify the true identities of Doe Defendants. Plaintiffs intend to serve a subpoena pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 on SBC seeking documents that identify each Defendant's true name, current and permanent addresses and telephone numbers, e-mail addresses, and Media Access Control addresses.

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d), discovery does not commence until parties to an action meet and confer as prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), unless by court order or agreement of the parties. A court order permitting early discovery may be appropriate "where the need for expedited discovery, in consideration of the administration of justice, outweighs the prejudice to the responding party." Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc., 208 F.R.D. 273, 276 (N.D.Cal. 2002).

After reviewing Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application to take discovery, the declaration of Carlos Linares, and the accompanying Memorandum of Law, the Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiffs' Application, based on: (1) the allegations of copyright infringement contained in Plaintiffs' complaint; (2) the danger that SBC will not long preserve the information that Plaintiffs seek; (3) the narrow tailoring of the discovery request so as not to exceed the minimum information required to advance this lawsuit without prejudicing the Defendants; and (4) the Court's finding that the expedited discovery requested will substantially contribute to moving this case forward. Furthermore, without such discovery, Plaintiffs cannot identify the Doe Defendants, and thus cannot pursue their lawsuit to protect their copyrighted works from infringement. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs may serve immediate discovery on SBC to obtain the identity of each Doe Defendant by serving a subpoena pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 that seeks information sufficient to identify each Doe Defendant, including the name, current and permanent addresses and telephone numbers, e-mail addresses, and Media Access Control addresses for each Doe Defendant.

2. Any information disclosed to Plaintiffs in response to the subpoena may be used by Plaintiffs solely for the purpose of protecting Plaintiffs' rights under the Copyright Act.

3. If SBC and/or the Defendant(s) wish to move to quash the subpoena, they shall do so before the return date of the subpoena. If such a motion is brought, SBC shall nonetheless preserve the information sought in the subpoena pending resolution of such motion.

4. Plaintiffs shall provide a copy of this Order to SBC when the subpoena is served.

20071220

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.