UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 24, 2008
CATHERINE GELLIS PLAINTIFF(S),
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. DEFENDANT(S).
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
✔9 Private ADR ( please identify process and provider ) ______________________
JAMS mediation. 1 day.
Mediator to be selected by March 1, 2008 by agreement of the parties ____________________________________________________________ _________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered .
✔9 other requested deadline
Not later than two weeks prior to hearing on class certification
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Mediation Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 90 days from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.