UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 28, 2008
CHARLES TWAIN CLEMANS, JR., PETITIONER,
JAMES A. YATES, WARDEN, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Peter C. Lewis U.S. Magistrate Judge United States District Court
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANOTHER RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND PETITION [Doc. 13.]
Now before this Court is Petitioner's request for an extension of time to file another response to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 13.) Petitioner has been represented by counsel, but he wishes to fire his attorney and proceed pro se from this point on in this case. (Id.) His attorney already has filed a response to Respondents' Motion. (Doc. 8.) In the interest of justice, the Court GRANTS Petitioner's motion to file another response to the Motion to Dismiss. It is ordered that Petitioner shall have until February 28, 2008 to file the response. Respondents shall have until March 13, 2008 to file any reply.
In the instant motion, Petitioner also requested leave of court to amend his habeas petition. (Doc. 13, at 2.) However, Petitioner has not filed the proposed second amended petition along with his motion. Thus, Petitioner's request to amend his petition is DENIED at this time. Petitioner may file a new motion to amend provided that he fully complies with the following directions. First, he must submit a proposed second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus along with his motion to amend. Second, the proposed second amended petition must have attached to it all documents referred to in it. The court will not search through the file to find other documents and assemble a coherent petition. Third, the second amended petition must provide a complete and sequential list of all claims petitioner is asserting in this action (e.g., claim 1, claim 2, etc.). Fourth, the motion to amend must explain (a) which of the claims in the second amended petition were not included in the original petition filed on June 27, 2007 and (b) why the new claims were not included in the original petition.
Should Petitioner choose to file a proposed second amended petition, he must file and serve his motion to amend along with the proposed petition no later than February 28, 2008. The deadline will not be extended; if the documents are not filed by that deadline, the action will go forward with only the claims that were asserted in the original petition. Respondents must file and serve any opposition to the motion to amend no later than March 13, 2008.Petitioner must file and serve his reply brief, if any, in support of his motion no later than March 27, 2008. The court will then consider whether to accept or reject the proposed petition in accordance with Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.