UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
February 19, 2008
CARDONET, INC., A CORPORATION PLAINTIFF,
IMB INC., A CORPORATION, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 25, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Patricia V. Trumbull United States Magistrate Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO PROVIDE SUPPLMENTAL DISCOVERY RESPONSES
WHEREAS Defendant IBM filed a motion to compel further responses to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories, and
WHEREAS Plaintiff did not oppose Defendant's Motion, and on or about February 8, 2008, the Court issued an order instructing Plaintiff to serve supplemental responses to Defendant's interrogatories no later than February 15, 2008, and
WHEREAS Plaintiff's counsel conferred with Defendants' counsel and requested an additional 5 days to finalize and serve the supplemental responses, and Defendants' agreed to Plaintiff's request subject to Court approval, the parties therefore, by and through their respective counsel, agree that Plaintiff shall provide complete, non-evasive supplemental responses to Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 of Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories no later that Wednesday, February 20, 2008.
DATED: February 15, 2008
Kenneth Frucht Bruce Van Dalsem Attorney for Plaintiff Cardonet Attorney for Defendant IBM
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.