UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
February 26, 2008
ANA RAMIREZ AND ISMAEL RAMIREZ, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
CONTINUE TIME FOR GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thelton E. Henderson United States District Court Judge
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2008, Plaintiffs Ana and Ismael Ramirez filed their Complaint For: 1. Violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act; 15 U.S.C. § 1691[¶] 2. Violation of the Fair 24 Housing Act; 42 U.S.C. § 2601 [¶] 3. Violation of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1981; and [¶] 4.
Violation of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1982, (the "Complaint");
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and are in agreement that there is good cause to extend the time of defendant Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. ("Greenpoint") to answer 3 or otherwise respond to the Complaint;
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, subject to approval of the Court, that defendant Greenpoint shall have through and including March 20, 2008, in which to file and serve its answer or other response to the Complaint.
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. [PROPOSED] ORDER
Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, defendant Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. shall have through and including March 20, 2008 in which to file and serve its answer or other response to the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.