UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
February 29, 2008
VIOLET BLUE, AN INDIVIDUAL, PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT,
ADA MAE JOHNSON ET AL., DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Judge Susan Illston United States District Court
[Pursuant to Civ. L. R. 3-4(a)(1), a complete list of parties represented appears in the 2 signature page of this document.]
Hon. Susan Illston
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Courtroom 10, 19th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Current CMC Date: March 11, 2008 Current Time: 2:00 p.m.
WHEREAS on January 19, 2008, Plaintiff Violet Blue ("Plaintiff Blue") and Defendant Ada Mae Johnson ("Defendant Johnson") received notice that this matter was reassigned to the calendar of 23 the Honorable Judge Susan Illston;
WHEREAS on January 21, 2008, the Honorable Judge Susan Illston issued a notice scheduling a Case Management Conference in this matter for March 10, 2008;
WHEREAS Plaintiff Blue is unavailable to attend the conference due to a prior, out of state, speaking engagement, and Plaintiff Blue very much wishes to personally attend the Case Management Conference;
WHEREAS Plaintiff's counsel has requested the stipulation of Defendant's counsel to rescheduling the Case Management Conference for Friday, March 21, 2008, however Defendant's counsel is in trial in another matter that day in the Western District of Washington;
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant are both agreeable to moving the date of the Case Management Conference to Friday, March 28, 2008, which is the same date as the hearing on Plaintiff Blue's Motion for Sanctions which is scheduled for 9:00 a.m.;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE and respectfully request the Court to order the Case Management Conference be continued from March 10, 2008, to March 28, 2008.
DATED THIS 29th day of February 2008.
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury 12 that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Robert Apgood.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.